Flat Fees & Fee Matching for PPM’s, Private Placement Offerings
Our billing options present the client with an opportunity to use flat fee pricing to better allocate risks to best suit the client’s goals for a particular offering project. In addition, our suite of services are building blocks that can be combined in different ways for the optimal project fee structure (without sacrificing experience or depth).
Given our depth of knowledge, affiliated attorneys, and comprehensive offering solution, we are confident our fee flat fee structure and packages are the most competitive you will find.
Finally, we emphasize process and billing transparency against the entirety of our fees. We do not bill for fees or services that were not fully discussed as part of a prearranged set of services with you. But most importantly, we want to establish long term client relationships and are willing to be flexible on fees with growth clients.
And we are absolutely open to matching competitor fee quotes and invite you to consult with us about your venture, your offering, and whether we can be of service at a matching rate/fee structure.
Why Us? Click for More.
| Convertible Note Offering for Startup Tech Co. | Private Placement Offering for Startup Restaurant | Private Placement Offering for Mature Co. Expansion Funds |
|---|---|---|
Client Goals: Medical device co. needed $350K in seed funds for proof of concept. Knew they wanted small group of angel investors, not 100's of crowdfunding investors. Deliverables: We determined that a debt offering at that amount made sense. We designed a convertible note offering and provided:
|
Client Goals: Restaurant/Bar startup required $5MM in buildout, salary and inventory financing against a unique investor preferred payout model. Deliverables: We designed a multi class unit equity offering with an investor preferred waterfall and provided:
|
Client Goals: Medical Insurance carrier needed $30MM in expansion funds to satisfy insurance regulatory agency capitalization requirements with unique array of risk factors, management structures, and statutory requirements. Deliverables: We designed a multi class unit offering with a side array of convertible notes and provided:
|
Fee Structure: Provided deliverables for a $4,500 FLAT FEE, paid in two installments. Competitor Advantage: Provided complete set of deliverables to implement offering for several thounsand dollars cheaper than competitors, with actual attorney counsel. |
Fee Structure: Provided deliverables for a $7,500 FLAT FEE, paid in two installments. Competitor Advantage: Provided complete set of deliverables to implement offering for several thounsand dollars cheaper than competitors, with actual attorney counsel. |
Fee Structure: Given extremely complex nature of offering, we used a reduced hourly fee that still achieved significant discounts for a rough total of $20,500 paid on a monthly basis. Competitor Advantage: Provided complete set of deliverables to implement offering for several thousand dollars cheaper than competitors, with actual attorney counsel. |
